The Reporter covers Miller, Morgan and Camden County in Central Missouri's Lake of the Ozarks and is published once per week on Thursdays.

(Last updated August 8, 2008)

NOTE TO READERS: WE HAVE MOVED.

We want to stress the fact that we have moved our offices to 2801 South State Highway 5 in Camdenton in October of 2007. The reason we want to stress this is for those who drive by the square in Camdenton and look to our old office. That office is now occupied by the Obama-ites. We want readers to understand that there is a snowball’s chance in a fiery place of torment that we would ever put an “Obama” sign in our window. - Dale Johnson, Publisher

(Published 8-6-08)

Editorial

The cost of a life

What is a human life worth? How about two lives? Would a hundred make it financially feasible? Last week a family lost a daughter and a grandmother in the same few minutes and the blame lies solely on the shoulders of the government.

First is the Missouri Department of Transportation.

They could come up with the money to fix the dangerous stretch of Highway 54 in Linn Creek if they wanted to. Proof of that came last year.

I was driving through Jefferson City and was re-routed because a stretch of Highway 54 was closed due to a tanker accident. The fire from the accident was so intense a bridge over the highway was damaged beyond repair.

Though it was not on MoDOT’s schedule or in their budget, it took no time at all to fund the project and in lightning-like speed the entire bridge was replaced. Not being able to use the bridge would have been an inconvenience but lives were not being lost because of it.

Why did MoDOT replace it so fast? Excuses were given, except one: the bridge was almost in sight of the Missouri Capitol Building.

Linn Creek is not, so you can add up all the lives lost on that stretch of Highway 54 and it still does not equal enough to fully get the attention from MoDOT or the state government to save people’s lives.

And what about our alleged representative Wayne Cooper? Or to be more precise DOCTOR Wayne Cooper. An examination of Dr. Cooper’s bills sponsored in the state since his election will see many, many bills helping the medical field (by the way, did I mention Cooper is a DOCTOR?).

A true representative would actually represent the people of his district, not just his profession. Maybe Cooper is working on the problem; maybe he will sponsor an emergency bill to immediately fix a dangerous section of highway. We’re waiting.

So is the government of Linn Creek, who have not been contacted by the “representative”.

A family held two funerals yesterday for the latest victims of that stretch of Highway 54; to them the two lives cannot be replaced by all the money in the world.

To our state government it appears to be just another day.

 

(Published 7-30-08)

Editorial

America's Future

The following was downloaded from the internet. There are two versions; read them both and see if you agree with us that the author really nails what is happening right now in America, and if we continue down the path we are on, we won’t be able to recognize America as we know it now in about 20 years. Scary.

TRADITIONAL VERSION: The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the ant is warm and well fed. The grasshopper has no food or shelter, so he dies out in the cold. MORAL OF THE STORY: Be responsible for yourself!

MODERN VERSION: The ant works hard in the withering heat all summer long, building his house and laying up supplies for the winter. The grasshopper thinks the ant is a fool and laughs and dances and plays the summer away.

Come winter, the shivering grasshopper calls a press conference and demands to know why the ant should be warm and well fed while others are cold and starving. CBS, NBC, PBS, CNN, and ABC show up to provide pictures of the shivering grasshopper next to a video of the ant in his comfortable home with a table filled with food.

America is stunned by the sharp contrast. How can this be, that in a country of such wealth, this poor grasshopper is allowed to suffer so? Kermit the Frog appears on Oprah with the grasshopper, and everybody cries when they sing, “It's Not Easy Being Green.”

Jesse Jackson stages a demonstration in front of the ant's house where the news stations film the group singing, 'We Shall Overcome.” Jesse then has the group kneel down to pray to God for the grasshopper's sake.

Nancy Pelosi, Barack Obama, John Kerry and Harry Reid exclaim in an interview with Larry King that the ant has gotten rich off the back of the grasshopper, and both call for an immediate tax hike on the ant to make him pay his fair share.

Finally, the EEOC drafts the Economic Equity and Anti-Grasshopper Act retroactive to the beginning of the summer! The ant is fined for failing to hire a proportionate number of green bugs and, having nothing left to pay his retroactive taxes, his home is confiscated by the government.

Hillary Clinton gets her old law firm to represent the grasshopper in a defamation suit against the ant, and the case is tried before a panel of federal judges that Bill Clinton appointed from a list of single-parent welfare recipients. The ant loses the case.

The story ends as we see the grasshopper finishing up the last bits of the ant's food while the government house he is in, which just happens to be the ant's old house, crumbles around him because he doesn't maintain it. The ant has disappeared in the snow.

The grasshopper is found dead in a drug related incident and the house, now abandoned, is taken over by a gang of spiders who terrorize the once peaceful neighborhood.

MORAL OF THE STORY: Be very careful how you vote in 2008! The party that offers you everything is also the party that can take everything from you.

Guest Editorial

Is this a coronation?

A year ago we fully believed we were in the midst of a coronation; that the election process was only a mere formality for the soon-to-be Queen Hillary. A year later, we have returned to our original premise that there would be a coronation. However, there is a slight change. The coronation will be for King Obama instead of Queen Hillary.

What happened? Obama is considerably more liberal than Hillary and the far left mainstream media jumped ship to the most liberal senator in America.

But, if the mainstream media is to be analyzed, a coronation may not suffice, because they are not treating Obama as a mere king; rather, one could easily believe they are treating Obama as the second coming of Christ.

King, Messiah, Anti-Christ. Call Obama, ever the bleeding-heart liberal, what you like, but there can be no doubt the mainstream media has sold its soul to him and his followers.

In yet another example of slavish adoration, all three major networks sent their evening anchors – Katie Couric, Brian Williams and Charlie Gibson – to accompany Obama on his trip to Europe and the Middle East.

Contrast this to what the same media did when the presumed Republican candidate, John McCain, went on a similar trip a few months ago: He, too went to the Middle East and Europe, yet none of the Big Three evening networks saw fit to send a traveling correspondent with him, let alone an anchor.

How did the Big Three do on reporting McCain’s trip? They had a total of four stories and one of them dealt exclusively with a McCain gaff. CBS, saw fit to give only 31 words to the trip during the entire week he was there.

To add a little icing to this cake, the Big Three, in a recent six-week period – after the Democratic primary had been decided – devoted nearly three times as much air time to Obama as they did to McCain.

The Big Three could still prove they haven’t totally sold out by subjecting their Messiah to tough questions about his liberal policies and flip-flops. Who are we trying to kid? Obviously, the liberal media can’t help themselves.

In the words of Brent Bozell, “They are already neck-deep in the tank for Sen. Obama, yet they have made the decision that still hasn’t been enough loving coverage of him. So the Big Three networks all determined that the remedy would be to go on the road for live daily on-air messages.”

Just when we think the mainstream media can’t sink any lower, they manage to prove us wrong. They are so “in-the-tank” for this far, far left liberal that they will do anything within their power to elect him. How we long for the day when the media did its job of reporting the news rather than shaping it. – Jack Krier

 

(Published 7-23-08)

Guest Editorial

The abortion president

If Barack Obama wins the presidency he would certainly be qualified to be called “The Abortion President” for no other major party candidate in the history of our country has been such a staunch supporter of abortion.

 Obama talks about bringing hope, faith and change to American politics. This, as we are continually learning, is just political “doublespeak.”

One of Obama’s top priorities as president would not only to protect abortion rights, but expand them as evidenced by his passionate support of The Freedom of Choice Act. Maybe by change, he means expansion of infanticide.

Obama has strongly criticized the Supreme Court decision upholding the partial-birth ban. Even worse, in the Illinois state senate, he opposed a bill similar to the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act, which prevents the killing of infants mistakenly left alive by abortion. If that isn’t selective infanticide, we need a new dictionary.

It is inconceivable to us that any American would not be opposed to this brutal killing of live babies, especially the leading candidate of a major political party for president of the United States.

How on earth can you support a candidate who is in favor of killing infants mistakenly left alive by abortion? Is that Obama’s idea of social justice?

And, let us not forget that Obama has oddly claimed that he would not want his daughters to be “punished with a baby” because of a crisis pregnancy. That is hardly a welcoming attitude toward new life!

The Christian Defense Coalition is leading a charge to inform Americans just how liberal Obama’s views on abortion are and they are working diligently to educate people of faith, especially Catholics and evangelicals, that Obama wants them to pay for abortions.

Obama’s nationalized health care plan would include abortion among the treatments available for patients who are sick, and that would force Christians with moral objections to the destruction of the unborn, to pay for that very act.

The coalition also states that “This (Obama) is not a candidate who is concerned about social justice, hope and equality. Rather, this is a candidate who will continue the violence and pain of abortion and refuse to end this tragic war against America’s women and children.”

The coalition is publicizing Obama’s abortion support through advertising that uses an image of Obama’s face imposed on Uncle Sam with the words: “I want YOU to pay for abortions.”

Kaitlin Clare, a spokeswoman with the coalition “Obama is reaching out to young evangelicals and wants change. “He claims to be for social justice. You can’t do all those things and be for killing innocent children,” she said. – Jack Krier

 

(Published 7-16-08)

Editorial

Read the label

Maybe I’m stupid. I am having a hard time understanding why we send billions of dollars to a communist country.

On the news page of this website and on page 4 of our print edition you will see a story about a recall. One of the items being recalled is something for children. This product could be hazardous to your child because of lead in the product. Where was it made? That’s right, China.

Americans tend to forget exactly what China is: it is a communist country that oppresses its people. But hey, what do we care as long as we can save a few dollars, right?

Read the label. Where is it made?

Next time you go and buy sandwich bags read where they are manufactured. Most brands are made out of this country and many are made in China. Think about that.

Some factory in China produces these sandwich bags, they box them and send them over here, we buy them and what do we do with them? We put our food in them. Are they safe? Maybe they are more sanitary than the ones made in the good ol’ USA but which would you trust? Should we take the chance?

I know people who have bought processed food from China. That is not a smart thing to do. If we can’t trust them to make a simple toy for our children that won’t contain a toxic substance, can we trust them with our food or even the bags we put our food in?

We here in the United States need to stop supporting a country which imprisons and kills its people rather than give them freedom. It will be a pain in the butt, we might have to pay more for something, but read the label.

If it’s made in China, don’t buy it.

 

(Published 7-9-08)

Guest Editorial

The lawyer’s party

Most small towns are blessed with good people who have chosen the law profession as a way to make a living. We admire and salute them. However, on the other end of the spectrum are those who give these honest, hard-working people a bad name. Included in the group are many politicians.

We recently ran across this interesting piece which should help open your eyes as to which political party you want to claim as yours.

“The Democrat Party has become the Lawyers’ Party. “Barrack Obama and Hillary Clinton are lawyers. Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama are lawyers. John Edwards, another former Democrat candidate for president is a lawyer, and so is his wife, Elizabeth.

Every Democrat nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate and also flunked out of divinity school). Every Democrat vice president nominee since 1976, except Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school.

Look at the Democrat Party in Congress: the Majority Leader in each house is a lawyer.

“The Republican Party is different. President Bush and Vice President Cheney were not lawyers, but businessmen. The leaders of the Republican Revolution were not lawyers. Newt Gingrich was a history professor; Tom DeLay was an exterminator; and Dick Armey was an economist. House Minority Leader John Boehner was a plastic manufacturer, not a lawyer. The former Senator Majority Leader Bill Frist is a heart surgeon.

“Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer? Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the nomination as a sitting president, running against Ronald Reagan in 1976.”

It’s easy to see the Republican Party is made up of real people who know exactly what it takes to make the payroll while the majority of the Democratic leaders have been at the public trough all their lives and know only that raising taxes is the way to meet the expenses.

Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, and want only for the government to tax those who are successful so they can have more money to spend for those who don’t create anything.

Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail? Big oil, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, fast food restaurant chains, large retail business, bankers and anyone else producing anything of value in our nation.

Lawyers try to solve problems by successfully representing their clients, in this case the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed; they seek to win lawsuits; they press appellate courts to overturn precedent; and lawyers always parse language to favor their side.

Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But, it is an awful way to govern a nation.

Today, we are drowning in laws; we are controlled by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives. Certainly, America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked as the system is today.

When the most important decision for our next president is whom he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big. When lawyers use criminal prosecution as a continuation of politics by other means as happened in the lynching of DeLay and Scooter Libby, then the power of lawyers in America is too great.

When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.

Obama promises us change. Yet, he has shown nothing but the same old Lawyer Party agenda.

Most Americans realize that a republic in which every major government action must be blessed by nine unelected judges is not what our Founding Fathers envisioned.

Most Americans grasp that we cannot fight a war when ACLU lawsuits snap at the heels of the defenders.

Most Americans understand that more lawyers and judges will not restore declining moral values or spark the spirit of enterprise in our economy.

Surely, most Americans realize that change cannot be brought to our nation by lawyers who already dictate American society and business.

Hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work.

More lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.

Remember this at the polls: Republicans are the party of business people and Democrats are the party of lawyers. – Jack Krier

 

(Published 7-2-08)

Editorial

More than fireworks

It’s not about fireworks, it’s not about partying; it’s about freedom. A freedom that came from bloodshed and death. The Fourth of July, or as it should always be called “Independence Day”, is just that - the day we declared our freedom from oppressive rule.

Britain has become one of our closest friends but there was a time when it was not so. There was a time when their armies marched in this country killing people who simply wanted freedom.

Today we tend to forget about the price that was paid to give us the freedom to whine and complain about trivial things. We tend to forget that a small group of people could stand with their lives against the might of the British Empire. Today the United States is still working to give freedom to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan and some think we should never have tried.

That attitude would have caused us to lose the war of independence. We have our freedom but we should not lift a finger to help anyone else obtain it for themselves?

So on this Fourth of July, Independence Day, think back to those who have no name, the simple farmer who decided to take up arms and fight for freedom. The widow or the sons he left behind when he died fighting the British.

It was not an easy fight or a simple one. Though the Declaration of Independence was signed in 1776, we had to fight to be able to apply that document to our lives.

After seeing the bombardment of Fort McHenry at Baltimore, Maryland, by Royal Navy ships in Chesapeake Bay during the War of 1812 an amateur poet by the name of Francis Scott Key wrote a poem entitled “the Defence of Fort McHenry”. That poem was later set to music and declared our National Anthem.

He saw firsthand what it takes to fight for freedom and how brave people stood, bled and died for that freedom we take for granted today.

Many know the first verse of the National Anthem but there are many more words to the song. The last verse says, very poetically, to remember and thank the Higher Power that you do have freedom.

O, thus be it ever when freemen shall stand, Between their lov'd homes and the war's desolation;

Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land Praise the Pow'r that hath made and preserv'd us as a nation!

Then conquer we must, when our cause. it is just, And this be our motto: "In God is our trust"

And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!

It’s Independence Day, celebrate and enjoy your freedom, just be sure to remember that freedom comes with a price and that price is blood.

 

(Published 6-18-08)

Editorial

Betraying the dead

Why is it that when people die they inevitably are portrayed as unjust, unfair, or just plain evil? The deposition by former (thankfully) editor Michael Feeback in the Greg Williams vs. Westside Star/Tom Turner lawsuit portrays Tom as just that – unfair, biased and using the paper for his own personal agenda.

That is not the Tom Turner we remember.

Reporter writer Jeff Thompson worked for the Lake Sun Leader under the direction of Feeback in the 1990s, Tom was there.

I also worked for the Lake Sun Leader under Feeback until I escaped in 1999.

The portrayal of Tom that Feeback states in his very interesting 123-page deposition is a completely different person than the one we knew. Maybe Tom changed since my departure in 1999, but to imply that he was behind the stories on Williams because of his personal bias is laughable.

In one of my last conversations with Tom, after I left, he told me that he looks at the editor as kind of a sub-contractor and rarely gets involved. During my time it was very rare that Tom would read a story before it was printed. He did get involved in rare instances, but do people really think that Tom dictated how articles should be written for two different editors in two different newspapers?

There are a handful of people at the Lake Sun Leader that I still have fondness for and Tom was one of them. It was sad to hear that he lost his battle with cancer.

Jeff and I can both testify that the biased one at the LSL was Feeback. If you don’t believe us, ask former Camden County Presiding Commissioner Merle Cross, who was tortured by Feeback in the newspaper.

So who really was behind the stories? Will there be a deposition of Westside Star editor Gary Young? What about reporter Ceil Abbott, who wrote the Westside Star story?

Maybe Tom did change; maybe he did start using his power for his own personal gain. Maybe he did direct every story about Williams in both papers to benefit him personally. We could ask him if he was here, but he isn’t, for the dead do not speak.

To portray Tom as a bitter angry person, screaming and yelling for his own agenda, is just plain wrong.

Above the law

Missouri lawmakers did the right thing in changing the village law. The law gave pretty much anyone the right to declare their property a village. That puts them outside of the county rule of law.

For instance, say you live in a part of Camden County that is strictly residential. You enjoy going out on your deck, seeing nature and enjoying the fresh air.

One day your next door neighbor submits a petition to become a village. You think nothing of it until it passes and they do become a village.

The next thing you know there are several thousand pigs being raised upwind from you. You object, but it’s too late. You can do nothing legally. They are a village and do not fall under county rule anymore. You have to deal with the pig smell or move.

That scenario or ones similar to that have become a reality in the state and in local counties. In a way the county commissioners are on the right track in objecting to the petitions, but the law is not on their side.

Whether anyone likes it or not, the law was and still is behind the petitioners. If someone meets the requirements to form a village, it has to be followed through.

To outright refuse or “put them on hold” simply because you want to is not following state law.

Some laws are on the books whether we like them or not and this is one of them.

Things will be better when the repeal becomes law on August 28. Until then, officials have to follow the current law whether they like it or not.

 

(Published 6-11-08)

Guest Editorial

Tax rebate explained

The recent tax rebate program thrust upon us by President Bush and Congress is a good example of how bone-headed our government has become and why we are headed on the fast track toward the world of socialism.

The program is a good example, also, about the difference in the two parties leading us to socialism.

The Democrats wanted the rebate to be bigger and that translates to the fact they are leading us to the awful world of socialism at a faster pace than are the Republicans because they wanted a “smaller” rebate.

This explains in real-life terms how the rebate program works.

Fifty thousand people went to a baseball game, but the game was rained out. Thus, a refund was due. The team was about to mail refunds when a group of Congressmen stopped them and suggested they send out the ticket refunds based on Congress’ interpretation of fairness.

Originally, the refunds were to be paid based on the price each person paid for the tickets. Unfortunately, that meant most of the refund money would be going to the ticket holders who had purchased the most expensive tickets. This, according to Congress is totally unfair.

A decision was made to payout the refunds in this manner, which, incidentally, is the same way the Congress and President Bush mandate the income tax refunds be distributed.

People in the $10 seats will get $15 back. After all, they had less money to spend on tickets to begin with. Call it an “Earned Income Ticket Credit.” Persons earn it by having few skills, poor work habits, and low ambition, thus keeping them at entry-level wages.

People in the $25 seats will get back $25 because it seems “fair.”

People in the $50 seats will get back $1 because they already make a lot of money and don’t need a refund. After all, if they can afford a $50 ticket, they must not be paying enough taxes.

People in the $100 luxury box seats will each have to pay an additional $25 because it’s the “right thing to do.”

People walking past the stadium who couldn’t afford to buy a ticket for the game each will get a $10 refund, even though they didn’t pay anything for the tickets. They need the most help. Sometimes this is known as Affirmative Action.

Now, do you understand? If not, contact any member of the Democratic Senate or several on the Republic side of the aisle because this is exactly what they thrust upon us.

Is it any wonder that the approval ratings of Congress are lower than a snake’s belly. Even President Bush’s low ratings tower above those of Congress. May we say, deservedly so. – Jack Krier

 

(Published 6-4-08)

Guest Editorial

Catch a wild pig

We are dreadfully afraid that the liberals of this country are leading us to become a nanny state; one in which the big-brother government provides us with all that we need for a short while, only to turn around and take away all our freedoms because all of our incentive to remain free has been severely dampened by the “generosity” of the government. We believe the following has so much truth in it and is a clear-cut example of what will happen to Americans.

There was a chemistry professor who had some exchange students in class. One day the professor noticed one young man (an exchange student) who kept rubbing his back and stretching as if his back hurt. The professor asked him what was wrong and he said he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country’s government and install a communist government. Then, he asked the professor a strange question: “Do you know how to catch wild pigs?”

The professor thought it was a joke but the young man said “This is no joke. You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and put corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come every day to eat the free corn. When they are used to coming, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming.

When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence. They get used to that and start to eat again. You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side.

The pigs, who are used to free corn, start to come through the gate to eat, you slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd. Suddenly, the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught. Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage for themselves, so they accept their captivity.”

The young man told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening in America. The government keeps pushing us toward socialism and keeps spreading the “free” corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income tax credit for unearned income, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops, welfare, medicine, drugs, free heath care, etc., while we continually lose our freedoms, just a little at a time. Remember, there is no such thing as a free lunch.

If the government provides you with something, it was not the government footing the bill; rather, it was one of your fellow Americans forced to do so.

If you think the “free ride” is essential to your way of life, you are not worthy to be called an American and God help you when the government slams the gate closed.

Thomas Jefferson said it best when he said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is big enough to take away everything you have.” – Jack Krier

 

(Published 5-21-08)

Guest Editorial

Time to wake up

Editor's Note: As we celebrate Memorial Day and think back to the ones who gave us our freedom, we have to think of our attitudes today. If the attitudes we harbor today (political correctness) were around in World War Two, we would have lost the war. Below are selected excerpts from Brigitte Gabriel's recent speech delivered at the Intelligence Summit in Washington DC. She is an expert on the Middle East conflict and lectures nationally and internationally on the subject.

“We gather here today to share information and knowledge. Intelligence is not merely cold hard data about numerical strength or armament or disposition of military forces. The most important element of intelligence has to be understanding the mindset and intention of the enemy.

The West has been wallowing in a state of ignorance and denial for thirty years as Muslim extremist perpetrated evil against innocent victims in the name of Allah. “I was ten years old when my home exploded around me, burying me under the rubble and leaving me to drink my blood to survive, as the perpetrators shouted, 'Allah Akbar!' My only crime was that I was a Christian living in a Christian town.

“I had a crash course in survival. Not in the Girl Scouts, but in a bomb shelter where I lived for seven years in pitch darkness, freezing cold, drinking stale water and eating grass to live. At the age of 13, I dressed in my burial clothes going to bed at night, waiting to be slaughtered. By the age of 20, I had buried most of my friends -- killed by Muslims. We were not Americans living in New York, or Britons in London. We were Arab Christians living in Lebanon.

“As a victim of Islamic terror, I was amazed when I saw Americans waking up on September 12, 2001, and asking themselves 'Why do they hate us?' The psychoanalyst experts were coming up with all sorts of excuses as to what did we do to offend the Muslim World. But if America and the West were paying attention to the Middle East they would not have had to ask the question. Simply put, they hate us because we are defined in their eyes by one simple word: 'infidels.'

Under the banner of Islam 'la, ilaha illa Allah, muhammad rasoulu Allah,' (None is god except Allah; Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah) they murdered Jewish children in Israel, massacred Christians in Lebanon, killed Copts in Egypt, Assyrians in Syria, Hindus in India, and expelled almost 900,000 Jews from Muslim lands.

We Middle Eastern infidels paid the price then. Now infidels worldwide are paying the price for indifference and shortsightedness. Tolerating evil is a crime. Appeasing murderers doesn't buy protection. It earns one disrespect and loathing in the enemy's eyes. Yet apathy is the weapon by which the West is committing suicide.

Political correctness forms the shackles around our ankles, by which Islamists are leading us to our demise. America and the West are doomed to failure in this war unless they stand up and identify the real enemy: Islam.

You hear about Wahabbi and Salafi Islam as the only extreme form of Islam. All the other Muslims, supposedly, are wonderful moderates. Closer to the truth are the pictures of the irrational eruption of violence in reaction to the cartoons of Mohammed printed by a Danish newspaper. From burning embassies, to calls to butcher those who mock Islam, to warnings that the West be prepared for another holocaust, those pictures have given us a glimpse into the real face of the enemy.

News pictures and video of these events represent a canvas of hate decorated by different nationalities who share one common ideology of hate, bigotry and intolerance derived from one source: authentic Islam. An Islam that is awakening from centuries of slumber to re-ignite its wrath against the infidel and dominate the world. An Islam which has declared 'Intifada' on the West.

America and the West can no longer afford to lay in their lazy state of overweight ignorance. The consequences of this mental disease are starting to attack the body, and if they don't take the necessary steps now to control it, death will be knocking soon.

If you want to understand the nature of the enemy we face, visualize a tapestry of snakes. They slither and they hiss, and they would eat each other alive, but they will unite in a hideous mass to achieve their common goal of imposing Islam on the world. This is the ugly face of the enemy we are fighting.

We are fighting a powerful ideology that is capable of altering basic human instincts. An ideology that can turn a mother into a launching pad of death. A perfect example is a recently elected Hamas official in the Palestinian Territories who raves in heavenly joy about sending her three sons to death and offering the ones who are still alive for the cause.

It is an ideology that is capable of offering highly educated individuals such as doctors and lawyers far more joy in attaining death than any respect and stature real life in society is ever capable of giving them.

The United States has been a prime target for radical Islamic hatred and terror. Every Friday, mosques in the Middle East ring with shrill prayers and monotonous chants calling death, destruction and damnation down on America and its people.

The radical Islamist deeds have been as vile as their words. Since the Iran hostage crisis, more than three thousand Americans have died in a terror campaign almost unprecedented in its calculated cruelty along with thousands of other citizens worldwide.

Even the Nazis did not turn their own children into human bombs, and then rejoice at their deaths as well the deaths of their victims.

This intentional, indiscriminate and wholesale murder of innocent American citizens is justified and glorified in the name of Islam. America cannot effectively defend itself in this war unless and until the American people understand the nature of the enemy that we face.

Even after 9/11 there are those who say that we must engage our terrorist enemies, that we must address their grievances. Their grievance is our freedom of religion. Their grievance is our freedom of speech. Their grievance is our democratic process where the rule of law comes from the voices of many not that of just one prophet.

It is the respect we instill in our children towards all religions. It is the equality we grant each other as human beings sharing a planet and striving to make the world a better place for all humanity. Their grievance is the kindness and respect a man shows a woman, the justice we practice as equals under the law, and the mercy we grant our enemy.

Their grievance cannot be answered by an apology for who or what we are. Our mediocre attitude of not confronting Islamic forces of bigotry and hatred wherever they raised their ugly head in the last 30 years, has empowered and strengthened our enemy to launch a full scale attack on the very freedoms we cherish in their effort to impose their values and way of life on our civilization.

If we don't wake up and challenge our Muslim community to take action against the terrorists within it, if we don't believe in ourselves as Americans and in the standards we should hold every patriotic American to, we are going to pay a price for our delusion.

For the sake of our children and our country, we must wake up and take action. In the face of a torrent of hateful invective and terrorist murder, America 's learning curve since the Iran hostage crisis is so shallow that it is almost flat.

The longer we lay supine, the more difficult it will be to stand erect.

 

(Published 4-30-08)

Editorial

Selective truth

The purpose of schools and especially teachers is to help the students learn a variety of subjects. Whether it is geology, biology, history or science, a good teacher will present all sides of the issue so the student can analyze, apply and think about the subject. It’s a sad thing when the public school systems of this country no longer allow that.

When I was in high school in the late 1970s, evolution was taught as a theory. I remember the science teacher saying that eons ago various things came together and caused the “Big Bang” and the universe was born.

I remember raising my hand and asking where the “various things” came from. The teacher responded by saying “good question” but was unable to answer it.

Today if someone says that, they run the chance of being laughed at, scorned and maybe even disciplined. If you are a teacher, the results could be worse.

Isn’t it the job of scientists to questions things? To present all sides of an issue? To be critical of theories?

Evolution is a theory and cannot be proven, just as creationism is a theory and cannot be proven. Both require a large degree of faith.

Our children are born and within a few years we send them to public schools where for the formative years of their life they are taught by strangers. And what they are taught many times contradicts the teachings of their parents.

Being able to see many sides of an issue and being taught to analyze data is the best way to learn anything. It is a sad state of affairs when you have to pass a bill giving teachers permission to present both sides of an issue, something they should be doing now without being penalized.

We doubt that Representative Wayne Cooper’s “Teacher Academic Freedom” bill will pass into law. As we have found out in the past, the larger cities, mainly St. Louis, has decided many issues for the rest of the state, whether we like it or not.

The religion of Secular Humanism is very vocal and powerful. Objections for a variety of reasons will probably be forthcoming in regards to this bill, and that should also educate us.

If the theory of evolution is grounded in endless scientific facts and can no longer be disproved, then why the objections?

 

(Published 4-23-08)

Editorial

Fighting among ourselves

The recent letter approved by the city of Osage Beach trying to lure in potential business is a good idea, but how it is used may cause conflict between them and other lake area cities. Though a brief mention was made to not try and lure businesses from other cities, nothing was guaranteed.

Osage Beach is the richest city in the lake area, with a huge budget and a large amount of tax revenue. Since money is power, that gives them a lot of it and the potential to abuse that power if they so choose. A drive through other cities will see less businesses and an apparent lack of growth.

Linn Creek has a large area of highway land that can be utilized by any new business wishing to capitalize off the traffic flowing through the area, but can they compete with their nearby big brother?

Camdenton is also seeking growth and allegedly has a large development in the works, in property across from Wal-Mart, but since its announcement nothing has been seen or heard from this project, no updates given to the public by the city and not one shovel of ground has been turned.

Could Osage Beach lure the developer away with their welcoming letter? They could, if they misuse it.

Lake Ozark has a huge development underway which will open up a new corridor and allow many new businesses to the city, which it desperately needs.

Any other city working to take that growth for themselves will start a war between the cities, hurting everyone. T

hough having less access to the lake, Laurie is also looking for growth. In other words, the competition is fierce and everyone wants the new business, whatever it is, to make their home in their city.

Competition is good, but caution is needed when going after potential new businesses and developments. Purposely luring a new business from one city to the next is wrong and hopefully the lake area cities will avoid that and work together for growth..

 

(Published 4-16-08)

Guest Editorial

Godspeed Charlton Heston

There have been several tributes written about Charlton Heston since his passing and in most of the glowing tributes, somewhere along the way, was mentioned his NRA leadership.

Heston was a giant of a man in the NRA. He was a leading figure for this great organization years before he became its president. An avid hunter and gun owner, and a student of history, Charlton Heston understood that lawful firearm ownership is an American birthright.

He so ably grasped that it is a civil rights issue and more to this belief than gun ownership. Heston marched with Martin Luther King, Jr., and was one of the foremost advocates of racial equality long before others took up the cause. This passion for civil rights and human dignity was part of the foundation for his Second Amendment leadership and an extension of his long crusade to protect individual liberty.

The 1990s – and particularly Bill Clinton’s presidency – were troubled times for the NRA, and this, to a large part, led to Heston ascending to the presidency of NRA. Also, perhaps more than any others, Heston and the NRA were able to derail Al Gore’s bid for the White House. We are thankful for that.

With Heston leading the charge, NRA’s numbers increased by nearly two million during his five years at the helm, as well as bringing exceptional public esteem to NRA as the leading organization in the country when it comes to defending the constitutional rights of individuals.

During this time, Heston was a tireless crusader for pro-Second Amendment candidates and policies. In the words of fellow NRA leader Sandy Froman, Heston “made the case like no one ever had that the right of law-abiding, peaceable Americans to keep and bear arms is a part of our Founding Fathers’ constitutional blueprint, designed to keep our land free and prosperous forever. It recognizes the sanctity of every person’s life and the right to defend themselves and those they love. It acknowledges that some things are worth fighting and even dying for. Most remarkably, the Second Amendment reflects a belief not commonly held by government today that ordinary Americans can be trusted to do the right thing.”

Like other great American leaders, Charlton Heston now belongs to the ages. His work is complete. But, the battle to protect the Second Amendment is, by no means, over. We all must step up to the plate, using whatever talents we are blessed with and honor his memory by continuing the fight for freedom that he fought so well.

Every time we heard him utter, “From my cold, dead hands,” it sent shivers up and down our spine. That’s the kind of leader Charlton Heston was.

We must do all that we can to make certain that what this great leader fought for, our government never takes away what he worked for so diligently.

Charlton Heston is gone, but for freedom-loving Americans, those who believe in the Second Amendment, he will never be forgotten. Godspeed Charlton Heston. – Jack Krier

 

(Published 4-2-08)

Lake Ozark’s ‘mystery expense’

There is a mystery in Lake Ozark, a mystery that will cost the city money: lots of it if we listen to the warnings from Alderman Robert Davis.

That mystery expense will be so great the city needs to watch every penny until September when the city coffers will apparently be drained. What that mystery expense entails is known only to the Board of Aldermen, if we follow the words of Davis.

For a city that has had more than its share of financial trials and burdens, speaking about a future expense that will hurt the city is not an encouraging remark. Spouting suggestions to that effect and leaving the expense a mystery makes matters worse.

If this is a legal matter that has been discussed in closed session then it needs to stay there until the matter is resolved. Speaking about it or even parts of it in open session could possible expose it to the Missouri Sunshine law.

In other words, if a board member speaks about part of it in open session, then the whole matter is open for anyone to demand to know the full details of this future expense.

To tell taxpayers their money will be used for something coming in September and then not tell them what that is, is wrong and taxpayers have a right to know what this “mystery expense” is.

 

(Published 3-12-08)

Puppets on a string

Have you ever felt like there are strings attached to you and you are being jerked around against your will? Some lake area residents are feeling that way after the Missouri Department of Transportation met with the Osage Beach Board of Alderman last week.

Their reason for the meeting: “sorry, but we may not have enough money for every part of the new expressway.”

This is getting to be a broken record with MoDOT and the state of Missouri. The lake area brings in a massive amount of money to the state in tourism dollars and every few years another excuse comes up to avoid helping alleviate traffic in this money rich area. This time the blame is placed on the Federal Government.

What about the tax increase that was voted for MoDOT with Amendment 3? Some may remember a multi year plan that promised to help the traffic in the lake area. The plan that all of a sudden ran out of money and MoDOT went begging again for more of our tax dollars.

Then the promise and even plans for an expressway, but now modifications (cutbacks) are being thrown in our face again.

 Maybe for one year we should keep all the tax dollars generated by the lake area and use them to fix our own problems. But that won’t happen and the puppet masters will continue to jerk us around whether we like it or not.

 

(Published 2-20-08)

A different kind of pot-ted plant

A coalition of police busted a marijuana operation last week in the lake area. This isn’t the first time an operation of this sort has been busted and knowing humans, it won’t be the last. The lake is a tiny bit safer now that this operation has been stopped. We can only hope that the prosecutor will not go easy on this case.

This wasn’t a simple incident of one pot plant in someone’s house or yard, but 137 plants. Either someone has a bad marijuana habit or they are selling it. The court case will (hopefully) tell us which one.

Society has formed a myth around marijuana and that is that it is safe, is not addictive and is actually helpful to the user. Nonsense. The old adage “you are what you eat” (or in this case smoke) is true.

Pot is one of the many things humans are putting into their bodies that results in damage, disease and a destruction of life. Notice some of the effects of marijuana from the United States Surgeon General.

Acute intoxication with marijuana interferes with many aspects of mental functioning and has serious, acute effects on perception and skilled performance, such as driving and other complex tasks involving judgment or fine motor skills. Among the known or suspected chronic effects of marijuana are:

• Short-term memory impairment and slowness of learning.

• Impaired lung function similar to that found in cigarette smokers. Indications are that more serious effects, such as cancer and other lung disease, follow extended use.

• Interference with ovulation and pre-natal development. • Impaired immune response.

• Possible adverse effects on heart function. The Public Health Service concludes that marijuana has a broad range of psychological and biological effects, many of which are dangerous and harmful to health, and it supports the major conclusion of the National Academy of Sciences' Institute of Medicine.

So despite the push to make is an acceptable, legal choice, the simple fact is it is damaging to the body. Your lungs were created for breathing, not filling full of any kind of smoke.

We hope that the effort to rid the lake area of drug producers will continue. The Lake of the Ozarks will be a safer place when that happens.

 

(Published 2-13-08)

None of your business

There were “challengers” at the polling places last week in Camden County. Most voters were not aware of these “challengers” and maybe most took no notice. A better description is “watchers”.

These watchers had the legal right, in a primary, to watch the way you voted. They were able to record your name and address and whether you took a republican or democrat ticket. They can take that information and use it for any purpose they want, but you know what they will do is hit you for money and support of their party.

In this country the right to vote is one of the great things about the Untied States and many are proud to exercise that right. If they are going to be discouraged or have their voting privacy invaded then some simply will not vote anymore.

A few years back a man walked into the county clerk’s office and asked County Clerk Rowland Todd if anyone could find out how he voted. Why did he ask that question? Because he was scared.

His union had told the employees how to vote and he did not want to vote that way. He was afraid that if the union found out he voted his conscience and not what was dictated to him he would be fired. Todd reassured him that no one could find out how he voted in an election.

That does not hold true for last week’s primary, thanks to the invasiveness of the watchers.

Todd told The Reporter that the watchers could do whatever they wanted with the lists they gathered, including publish them and who voted for what party if they desired.

A simple solution until the law is changed is to vote absentee. Todd said the watchers could not monitor the absentee voting.

So a last message to the watchers: keeping track of how a person voted last week (unfortunately) may be legal and backed by the law, but it’s still none of your business.

 

(Published 2-6-08)

PA Costly mistake

A simple mistake will be costing taxpayers in the Camden Ambulance District an extra $10,000. Who was at fault for the mistake was not stated but it could have been avoided.

The building and design was built after 2006 so the architect should have known about the new codes. If it was his fault then that $10,000 should be his responsibility.

If it was the Mid-County Fire Marshall, then he should have known about the new codes and told them during the initial inspection.

No matter who is to blame it ends up as a (small) black eye for the ambulance district. Having been the only media outlet with a consistent presence at the Ambulance District board meetings over the years, we have seen them struggle with the task of fulfilling the voter’s wishes: having our own ambulance service.

We have also seen them take criticism for a variety of issues in their quest and as with all tax entities, criticism never ends, but giving people something to criticize doesn’t help.

Humans are not perfect (sorry to break that news to some) and mistakes will be made, but going by outdated building codes is very hard to excuse.

When the Montreal station is operational, residents of the area that are in need of an ambulance will be grateful for the shortened response time, even if it does cost an extra 10 grand. If it means someone’s life or death, it’s worth it.

To a tax entity like the ambulance district, with over a million dollar budget per year, $10,000 may not seem like much, but to the taxpayer it is and the whole thing could have been easily avoided if someone would have paid attention.

 

(Published 1-30-08)

Protecting the Heart

It’s good to know that the higher-ups in Washington turn their eyes upon us humble lake dwellers once in a while in a good way. The recent grant to help protect the dam from terrorist attacks is a step in the right direction.

Though Bagnell Dam may be a low priority target, it still is a target. Being a tourist area it’s very easy to approach the dam in a vehicle, boat, truck or on foot. The added equipment to help keep an eye on the dam will not stop a dedicated terrorist, but it is a deterrent.

The best equipment for preventing an attack on the dam, or anywhere is your eyes. Police depend on citizens for help and any suspicious activity or vehicles around the dam need to be reported. It may be nothing, but do you want to take the chance?

Look at the scenario: A terrorist does set off an explosive that destroys the dam. Billions and billions of dollars would be lost and would the dam even be rebuilt?

How many years would it take to do so?

How many years can the area survive without tourist or boating until the dam was rebuilt?

How many boats and docks would be destroyed with little to no water in the lake?

And the worse part: the smell of thousands of dead fish all over the entire lake area would be horrendous.

The one thing to remember is the Muslim terrorists want to kill Americans. They don’t care if you’re a republican or a democrat, you are an American and that is enough. Destroying the dam would cost a massive amount of money to the state and the country, but the death toll would be relatively small.

They want to kill as many Americans as they can and blowing up the dam would not do that.

Still, it is a target and the more protection we have, the safer the heart of the Lake of the Ozarks will be.

 

(Published 1-16-08)

Inducing a heart attack

Boating is the life blood of the Lake of the Ozarks. Everyone knows that. The recent proposal by Representative Wayne Cooper, M.D., may threaten that life blood.

Everyone who has been on the lake or is planning to do some activity wants to do it safely. In addition to that, docks take a constant pounding during the summertime and can cost dock owners a lot of money.

All that is understandable but a few minutes spent by any part of the lake in the summertime will show millions of dollars floating upon the lake in the form of boats and other watercraft. Those boats over 30 feet in length – the size stated by Cooper in his bill – purchase a lot of gas for those vessels and the profit from that gas money, along with drinks and food, go to the economy of the lake area.

A boat owner who has a vessel over that length is not going to bring a boat to the lake if they can’t enjoy it. The current 100 feet is a reasonable amount of distance from a dock, pier or anchored vessel.

Increasing it to 300 feet puts an interesting question to that boat owner: Is it worth it to come to the Lake of the Ozarks anymore?

Should they take their dollars elsewhere?

Being a doctor, Cooper should realize the dangers that come from restricting the blood flow to a body. Too much of a restriction can cause a heart attack or death.

That applies to a human body and a body of water.

 

(Published 1-9-08)

Spying on each other

Has it come to the point where the government doesn’t trust us? The new law that took effect January 1 basically says just that. So the state turns to the landlords to squeal on their renters.

It isn’t the job of the landlords to report everybody who rents from them and why they are renting and what they are renting for. One of the problems is privacy.

In question are mini-storage units. Though the law does not specifically name them, they have been brought up. Is the mini-storage owner supposed to inspect the contents of every unit? Renters have rights and unless it is in the rental agreement, the landlord cannot inspect the contents any time they want. T

he law also makes more work for the assessor. How many duplicate lists of the same vehicles or boats or airplanes will end up in the assessor’s office causing confusion?

Will any marinas lose business because of the new law?

Many questions but no answers and it all really doesn’t matter now, it’s the law.

No one likes to pay taxes but in this state it is required to license vehicles, whether they are boats, airplanes, cars or whatever. The information is already turned in, why double it? Simple answer: that state does not trust us.

Many Missourians don’t trust the state either so I guess it’s even. The only difference is they can make the laws to make our lives harder while we can only vote them out of office: the laws will more than likely stay intact.

Readers need to ask how did their representative vote on this issue. Call him or her and ask them why this law was enacted and were they for burdening the people even more all in the name of the almighty tax dollar?

 

(Published 12-26-07)

Say Goodbye

It’s the end of the year and time to say goodbye. For good or bad, 2007 is nearly over and never will it return.

For many it’s good, let’s get rid of it and start new. For others, memories have made the year special and one that may have an impact on their lives for as long as we live.

We can say goodbye to our sanity. If you thought the race for President of the Untied States was already annoying, you can bet your lucky penny that it will get worse. Why can’t they focus on convincing us they will be a good leader instead of focusing on the dirt?

Maybe 2008 will bring us to the point where we stop digging up what a candidate did 30 or 40 years ago: “So and so messed his diaper when he was a baby. Do you really want a president who has that attitude?” That’s right, say goodbye to your sanity.

We here at Reporter Publishing are saying goodbye to the Camdenton Chamber of Commerce. We refused to renew our dues with them for two reasons.

One, we couldn’t figure out what benefits we get from being a member. Two, and the most important reason is we are sick and tired of the bias by those in charge of the Camdenton Chamber.

There are two newspapers and four printers according to the Chamber’s online list of members. But whenever the chamber needs their newsletter printed and brought to the people, the members have no choice in the matter.

It is given to only one of the members and then to obviously show the bias, the publisher of that newspaper is now on the Chamber’s board of directors.

Chambers should be fair to all their members. The Camdenton Chamber is not. No state law governs what they do, but we can and have refused to support them anymore.

The 2007 year is nearly over, so for good or bad it’s time to say goodbye.

 

(Published 12-26-07)

Have a Merry (insert politically correct non-offense generic term here)

It’s that time of the year again when people make millions of dollars off of a holiday they don’t want to mention.

I went into the local Wal-Mart in Camdenton the other day looking for a Christmas tree. I found trees for sale, all decorated and very beautiful, but never did I see the word Christmas on any of them.

I then looked at the “gift” wrap and the “gift” bows and the “gift” boxes and nowhere was the word Christmas on any of the tags or boxes. A search for Christmas lights was equally fruitless since they are not called “Christmas” lights.

One can’t blame the local Wal-Mart or Target or any of the other stores since they have no control over what the packaging says, but one can blame the parent companies who partake of this politically correct anti-Christian nonsense.

In this paper we have a special section on bringing Christ back into Christmas. We want to thank the advertisers who have the guts to stand up to the War on Christmas and show that the real reason for the holiday is the birth of Jesus.

Now comes the part that is not politically correct and some may not like.

Those lights that are wrapped around the houses are Christmas lights.

Those are Christmas ornaments that are decorating the Christmas trees.

It is Christmas paper with the mistletoe and holly and wreaths and Santa’s and candy canes on them.

Those are Christmas carols you are hearing people sing.

It is the Christmas Season that stores are taking advantage of and making millions of dollars off of.

It is the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ.

For those who don’t like the fact that Christ is in Christmas and this is the Christmas season, two words: too bad.

Merry Christmas.

Bah Humbug!

 That’s right, bah humbug.

The decorations hit the stores right after Halloween in order to get people in the “holiday spirit” but rarely do you find the name of Jesus mentioned. Bah humbug!

The bell ringers hit the stores and people drop their coins and dollars in the little red bucket, but how many give all year round to help people instead of the once a year to ease their conscience? Bah humbug!

The music begins to play in the stores in order to get you into the “spirit” of the season but what spirit do they wish you to have? The spirit of love, the spirit of giving, the spirit of thankfulness that a savior was born to bear the sins of the world? No, they want you to get into the spirit of the season so you can buy things for their profit. Bah humbug!

And the music that does play will be “Jingle Bells” or “Here Comes Santa Claus” or one of the other songs that have nothing to do with Jesus. Only in rare circumstances will you hear a song about Jesus played during the “holiday” season. Bah humbug!

Though Jesus was not born on December 25 and most of the customs that are celebrated come directly from paganism, it is the one time of the year when the world allows Christians to celebrate the birth of Jesus and even that is being attacked.

Disagree? Then try to celebrate the birth of Jesus in July. Try to sing Oh Holy Night or Away in the Manger or Silent Night in July and see how people react. It’s forbidden. You’re only allowed to sing about His birth one time a year and only when they tell you it’s okay. Bah humbug!

They tell you that they don’t want to offend the Jews or the Muslims or the Atheists or the Satanists or whoever so they use the word “holiday” instead. And if they knew the meaning of the word “holiday” and its origins they wouldn’t use that either because according to Merriam-Webster the word “holiday” comes from Middle English, from Old English haligdæg, from halig holy + dæg day. In other words, the “holiday” season means the “holy day” season.

Chanukah is more than one day and Kwanzaa is not even a real holiday so what one day during this season is a Holy Day? The one they are afraid to mention. Bah humbug!

Jesus said it best in John 15:18-19 “If the world hate you, you know that it hated me before it hated you. If you were of the world, the world would love his own: but because you are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hates you.”

Back to the dictionary: Bah - used to express disdain or contempt.

Humbug - something designed to deceive and mislead, a willfully false, deceptive, or insincere person, an attitude or spirit of pretense and deception, nonsense, drivel.

To all the anti-Christs who are working to remove Jesus from the season, this is for you: Bah humbug!

 

All content is Copyright 2008 by Reporter Publishing, L.L.C. Unauthorized reproduction is prohibited without written permission.